Acts of the Apostles/Cheap Complex Devices 77
Acts of the Apostles/Cheap Complex Devices | |
author | John F.X. Sundman |
pages | 400 |
publisher | Rosalita Associates |
rating | 9 |
reviewer | Hemos |
ISBN | (see website for each) |
summary | Two Sundman books combined for even greater power. |
First of all, I'm not going to be doing another review of Acts, as I've already done that once. It is worth noting, however, that this is the first time both CCD and Acts have been brought together in an omnibus edition. I've got two different copies of Acts, but greatly enjoyed reading the two together again. Why? Because they fit together like two sides of the same coin -- or better yet, like Walther Matthau and Jack Lemmon.
Cheap Complex Devices's backdrop is that of being (supposedly) machine-written. (The foreword and descriptors of the book itself are greatly entertaining. It's that kind of writing that flows over into Acts.) While the scene may (or may not) have not even the slightest passing resemblance to reality, it's still something that grips your mind. You believe that the "Hofstader Prize for Machine Written Narration" could exist, and that the Society for Analytical Engines sounds pretty reasonable. Heck, it sounds at least as reasonable as the ACM.
BTW, if you can't be bothered to read Acts of the Apostles, take my advice and do it. I believe my standing quote on the book is that it's what Tom Clancy would write if he wasn't dumb. Essentially, it's a great techno-thriller, except the technology is something that a geek would appreciate -- but it's also written well enough that non-geeks will enjoy it. The hero of that book makes an apperance in CCD as one of the heroes in one of the automata written texts.
The actual text of the stories in CCD are just as amusing as the commentary about them, although oddly enough I think I actually like the commentary more then the stories. "Bees" is a commentary on what it means to be human, albiet with a peculiar focus on Gatorade. And the Bonehead Computer - well, just doing a little Googling for it.
I'm not sure what else to say about these books, other then read 'em. If you liked Naked Lunch, or any sort of thrillers, or thought GEB was an amazing work, or just like to read, these books will thrill ya.
To get them, John has a website to purchase CCD. He takes Paypal or checks in the mail. You can buy them in PDF or have dead tree versions sent, or both. Whatever -- you do what want. One caveat though: "Final 'truth in advertising' note: the version of CCD on my website is 87.9842% the same as the final book form (the book is better). I'll reconcile them soon. " (note from John)
Enjoy.
Re:I've said it before (Score:1)
And you were counting on Slashdot to stop the rot?
Re:I've said it before (Score:2, Insightful)
What's next, a 15-year anniversary review of "The Last Temptation of Christ?"
"The Last Temptation of Christ" was a great film, and probably one of the most realistic portrayals of Jesus ever made.
"Acts of the Apostles" is a good way of challenging "the moral community" because it frees the expression. Many people persue thier interests with devotion, and purpose...just as religious people persue god. It's not up to you to determine the correct way to persue god. If someone finds god in a kernal, or a diesel engine, or a dusty old book...it's better than not finding god at all...wouldn't you agree?
Re:I've said it before (Score:1)
And yeesh, if you're concerned about that, how do you feel about Blair Brown's Ax of the Apostles?
(Hey,
Re:I've said it before (Score:1)
I wonder how many upset christians have even read the book, it's pretty good, and I don't think it will destroy your faith. It's just some guy's (a devout christian's) interpretation of the story.
Re:I've said it before (Score:1)
Re:I've said it before (Score:1)
Re:I've said it before (Score:1)
Touché!
Jesus aint going nowhere fool (Score:1)
I'm a sci fi freak
Awesome Idea! (Score:2, Interesting)
Unfortunately I think that a lot of people will right these guys off as amatuer writers, because they aren't just using traditional publishing means, as well as the fact that other people are helping write the book!
I don't care what other people think cuz I like 'em!
Re:Awesome Idea! (Score:2)
What is an "open source" book? It *sounds* like it's a book where the source , i.e., the text, is available for anyone to read. You know, just like a, um, *book*.
Acts was... okay. (Score:3, Insightful)
Okay, I read it a while back, and Acts of the Apostles is a good argument against self-publishing, or at least a good argument for finding an editor. The tech is okay, but the story suffers for it. The story is clunky and some of the characterization is kind of weak.
I suppose you might think it was good compared to Tom Clancy, but Tom Clancy is lowbrow jingoistic pap, so _that's_ hardly a compliment. At least you can escape the chest-beating in Acts of the Apostles...
It was okay, but it was just okay. Worth a read if you aren't doing anything else for a long time and don't have anything better kicking around.
Re:Acts was... okay. (Score:1)
so it's something to do at work?
Re:Acts was... okay. (Score:1)
Re:Acts was... okay. (Score:1)
Re:Acts was... okay.... (Score:1, Insightful)
I'm all for making your own way, but the previous poster was correct in saying that the flaws detracted considerably from a potentially good book. As is, I'd say 'Acts' has it moments but its annoyances obscure what should have been a much more fun read.
Nice to see holy powers making inroads (Score:2, Funny)
Dead tree version? (Score:1)
Re:Dead tree version? (Score:2, Insightful)
Trademark Dispute (Score:2)
Doesn't Luke the Physician [blueletterbible.org] have a trademark on the "Acts of the Apostles"?
Re:Trademark Dispute (Score:1)
Re:Proofreading skills (Score:2)
My opinion of Acts of the Apostles (Score:5, Informative)
Although Sundman writes well and creates some interesting scenes, I found that Acts didn't really gel. The plot developed more slowly than I expected, and there was too much exposition and discussion. Although he obviously knows a lot about computers, his attempt at plausible biotechnology wasn't convincing.
MILD SPOILER:
Bad guys demonstrate a nanomachine that can activate single genes. Sundman thinks that if you activated a growth hormone gene along one side of a mouse, that side would grow, in a matter of minutes!
END SPOILER
The bad guys' evil plot, when it's finally revealed (more by authorial fiat than anything else, IIRC) is a good (if implausible) premise for a thriller, but it is all left too late in the book. With the wide-ranging plot strands and technical detail, it could have been a biocomputing equivalent of Cryptonomicon, but I was a bit disappointed.
On the plus side, there are LOTS of ideas and plot strands in the book. The portrayal of the ways of computer developers is interesting and engaging. In particular, a lot of the book revolves around the actions of what seems to be a thinly disguised version of Sun Microsystems (Sundman worked for them) and their computer language 'espresso', so it might be especially entertaining if you know the company well.
I wouldn't particularly recommend Acts, but I would like to read his future books.
Re:My opinion of Acts of the Apostles (Score:1)
And the main character I found to be a boring pathetic overly-macho chump whose always-in-charge abilities were completely unbelievable. I have no sympathy with him whatsoever, and I'm praying he gets killed before the end
All that said, it was worth the $5 I paid. You could see some promise there, and I'll probably check out his next one just to see if he's improved. But I have to disagree with the reviews that place him up with Bruce Sterling or Neal Stephenson, it's not even in the same league. His use of technology and geek-material is thorough and fairly well done (maybe even better than Sterling or Stephenson), but Sterling and Stephenson aren't just geeks
Re:My opinion of Acts of the Apostles (Score:1)
Re:My opinion of Acts of the Apostles (Score:1)
Correct grammer + incorrect spelling == 1 link to wetmachine on all of Google
Re:My opinion of Acts of the Apostles (Score:1)
The author is a very dedicated and passionate writer and I've talked with him in the past. I hope to see someone pick up his books and boost his success because I'd like to see him doing well enough financially that he could continue to put out these high quality stories more often rather than sacrificing his personal and family life as we have all heard about in the past just to get a book published.
Considering the crap that is published today and makes a lot of money, I find it unforgivable that publishers haven't taken to his work. There's an audience for almost *everything* if the gaurdians of the publishing gateways weren't so damned stingy.
Shameless endorsement (Score:2)
Both are good reading. Both are very different.
1) Read Acts of the Apostles first.
2) Read Cheap Complex Devices second.
Buy both. CCD explains the backstory/metastory of Acts, albeit in a roundabout, artsy-fartsy way. (And I'm sure there are the kernels of at least two or three more AI-authored novels in CCD. *g*)
Does anyone know if Sundman (the author) will be at LinuxWorld in New York or the next one in the Bay Area? (I found out about him through a geek who loaned me a dead-tree copy he got from Sundman, who was selling copies at LinuxWorld SF.)
Re:Shameless endorsement (Score:1)
I want a second edition / SGE by Matt Ruff (Score:3, Interesting)
On a side note, I highly recommend Matt Ruff's Sewer Gas & Electric [att.net] to any Sundman or Stephenson fans.
Re:I want a second edition / SGE by Matt Ruff (Score:1)
Re:I want a second edition / SGE by Matt Ruff (Score:1)
I've plowed through many a $3-5 fantasy book and have never seen such publishing problems. What gives nowadays?
Re:I want a second edition / SGE by Matt Ruff (Score:1)
I just completed my first book (co-completed, actually), and according to a couple of old-timers who did other work on the series the quality of compositors has really gone down in recent years. We got lucky and got a pretty good one, but apparently competent compositors are really getting hard to come by -- at least at the prices publishers are willing to pay.
Of course, there is such a thing as author review. Ultimately, a lot of these problems really rest with the author failing to do an adequate job of reviewing the final draft.
Hmmmm (Score:1)
Re:Hmmmm (Score:1)
How to order? (Score:2)
Bryan
Omnibus confusion (Score:1)
How uninformative can a review get? (Score:3, Insightful)
Now re-read the "review" with this in mind. See? Or actually don't see?
Some guy sells a book the reviewer liked but can't describe or at the very least give a good reason to read. You can buy it on paper or as a PDF.
So what? I still have no clue whatsoever what this is all about.
It's a book. A review should allow me to decide wether it might be a book I'll like or not. I just know that I can buy it using Paypal.
I'll go and read what's online. To achevie this goal, a simple link was enough.
Don't call it a review.
I can write tons of 'reviews' about books I loved: I can't tell you why it's good, it's just sort of Brin & Robinson come togeter, you'll like it! Even If you're not interested in reading a book, give it a try, you'll like it for no reason I can describe, but its a sure hit nonetheless! I could even add more exclamation points to mask my total lack of arguments by some textual manifestation of over-excitement!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Acts of the Apostles (Score:2, Interesting)
People, there's a reason why this book wasn't picked up by a major publisher - it's crap.
-Nissim
Re:Acts of the Apostles (Score:1)
Bandwidth Limit Exceeded (Score:1)
Google cache is at: http://216.239.51.100/search?q=cache:MGBZE0sAFnUC
and cache is available for subsequent pages.
Re:Bandwidth Limit Exceeded (Score:1)
http://web.archive.org/web/20011008042318/http://
-SS
Good words for Acts (Score:1)
I will grant that the younger /. audience members may not appreciate the references to DEC and the Mill, but I don't find they detract from the story, which blends a fictional plot with real-life facts, and whether you believe it could be true or not, it's still a good story. Maybe there's a proofing problem here and there, but that's not the reason to skip out on a well-thought book that in particular caters to the intelligent reader.
I thoroughly enjoyed Acts and in fact read it through nearly nonstop, except for the annoying interruption of having to go to work. I'll be ordering CCDs as soon as I can find my checkbook under the rubble of my desk.
Re:Good words for Acts (a documentary?) (Score:1)
Hidden in the plot are all sorts of inside jokes, parodies, and even accurate descriptions of real events that shaped the valey.
By far my favorite is his retelling of the kinda-famous Borland-Microsoft-Limousine-Recruiting Lawsuits that may have crippled Borland. (Check out http://computernewsdaily.com/128_050897_102205_92
Coolest thing is that apparently AotA was written even before those limo trips became public! Scary how similar they are, though.
Re:Good words for Acts (a documentary?) (Score:1)
which is better for the author, paypal or check? (Score:2)
- adam
Re:which is better for the author, paypal or check (Score:1)
John posts regularly in K5 (Score:1)