Slashdot Log In
My Life as a Quant
from the sharks-and-jets-and-quants dept.
| My Life as a Quant: Reflections on Physics and Finance | |
| author | Emanuel Derman |
| pages | 292 |
| publisher | John Wiley & Sons, Inc. |
| rating | 9 |
| reviewer | Charlie Dickinson |
| ISBN | 0471394203 |
| summary | Autobiography of a theoretical physicist turned serious programmer, turned Wall Street quantitative finance wizard |
A complete understanding of Derman's work as physicist, or as finance theoretician, is of course beyond the scope of a memoir. This reviewer studied quantum mechanics in college and took an MBA at UCLA (more about this later) -- adding to my interest in the memoir's technical discussion -- but Derman reasonably pitches his discussion toward a lay audience with many helpful visuals to describe less obvious mathematical relationships. Do not let the perceived arcana of Derman's work keep you away from this memoir.
Emanuel Derman came to New York City in 1966 from Cape Town, South Africa. He started a Ph.D in theoretical physics at Columbia, somewhat in awe to be studying among a cluster of Nobel Laureates. As a teenager, Derman had hopes of being another Einstein if he stayed with physics. But as he notes, time decay happens to ambition. Seven years after earning his Ph.D, he was happy to be an employed postdoc, sharecropping his knowledge of particle physics to willing bidders.
The job market for theoretical physicists continued south. Family responsibilities, his wife's career as a biologist, and iffy prospects for a tenured teaching position --these all added up to Derman abandoning his love of physics, and going to work for money at Bell Labs.
There, Derman fell in love with programming (lex and yacc being two favorite tools). During five years, he built compilers and designed a nonprocedural language, HEQS (Hiearchical EQuation Solver), a precursor to Visicalc. But he never quite adjusted to the politics of Bell Labs, and by 1985, Wall Street was beckoning.
Executive recruiters sought out high-value programmers like Derman. He took a position with Goldman, Sachs in the Financial Strategies Group and began modeling options. It was a good fit. He found himself using sophisticated modeling techniques comparable to "doing physics." Moreover, he soon would collaborate with another Goldman, Sachs employee, one of the most influential theoreticians around: Fischer Black, whose Black-Scholes option pricing model (1973) is a benchmark in the field.
But My Life as a Quant is more than technical discussion; it's also a human interest narrative. The chapter "Easy Travel to Other Planets," about Fischer Black, is worth the price of this book. With compassion and honesty, Derman evocatively portrays his genius mentor. Derman shrewdly assesses what the arc of his life has meant. He shares vulnerabilities, decisions made from the weakness of loneliness, for example. Or, in a self-deprecatory vein, faux pas he committed. He's around Nobel Laureates in both physics and economics, and while noting such illustrious company can at times seem self-serving, the overall effect remains an engaging, complex self-portrait.
One idea about the world of quants Derman dispels is that derivative securities are wholly computer-driven. Despite more computing power on Wall Street, Derman asserts human imagination still leads the way. It takes a Fischer Black to intuit the qualitative to set up the quantitative model. Modern computational tools, however, aid the visualization such creative work thrives on.
As an example of the foregoing, and on a personal note, this reviewer remembers derivative security analysis circa 1969. While pursuing an MBA at UCLA, I did grunt work for a private hedge fund, run out of a Westwood apartment. Technology then was a time-sharing computer terminal and a telephone. The fund strategy was to short warrants and go long on the underlying common stock, where arbitraging opportunities were identified, a strategy borrowed from earlier work by Edward Thorp and Sheen Kassouf. My job was simple: I charted historical price data on clear acetate sheets in colored inks for all outstanding warrants against the underlying stock.
I drew hundreds of graphs, assisted in part by an Israeli graduate student (who had fought in the 1967 Six-Day War). I can't recall his name, but remember that when I'd drop by with more price data, ready to take away graphs, he invariably offered toast and coffee. One morning, I brought yet another roll of graphs to the Fund manager's apartment/office. Steve met me outside, saying he'd just got off the phone with Paul Samuelson at MIT, who wanted to know what our graphs looked like. Samuelson had written an article on warrant pricing, Steve added, which was why he was interested in what we turned up. I knew Samuelson as the author of an economics textbook I'd used a few years earlier.
Another morning, when I motorcycled over to drop off charts, Steve again was outside. He said, "Shelton and Markowitz are here." Professor John Shelton had hired me, of course, but I had no idea who Markowitz was -- he evidently did unspecified work with Shelton. Inside, I was quickly introduced to Harry Markowitz, who unrolled my graphs, becoming immediately absorbed. "Let me get a gestalt on this," was all he said. I didn't know then I was in the same room with the inventor of Modern Portfolio Theory. Now I can say he would see something that maybe a Fischer Black, or, these years later, an Emanuel Derman, might see. When he looked up, he said I did good graphs. I never saw him again.
Years later, I felt honored the low-tech grunt work my Israeli colleague and I labored over had interested those two men, Samuelson and Markowitz. They both received the Nobel Laureate in Economics (1970 and 1990, respectively). My point being -- and I'm sure Derman agrees -- it's not great computers that make breakthroughs in the financial theory. It's great imagination plus the tools at hand! (Obviously, though, computers have changed much of the grunt work.)
For me, My Life as a Quant summoned personal memories, but the odyssey of Emanuel Derman from South Africa to Wall Street is a rewarding memoir for anyone with even a casual interest about how the world of finance is being re-imagined. Emanuel Derman didn't really go to Wall Street to get rich. This memoir is a testament to his true passion in life, whether in theoretical physics, in software programming, or in the modeling of derivative securities. He always wanted interesting problems to work on.
You can purchase My Life as a Quant: Reflections on Physics and Finance from bn.com. Slashdot welcomes readers' book reviews -- to see your own review here, read the book review guidelines, then visit the submission page.
Weird... (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Weird... (Score:2)
Let's be honest now.
Re:Weird... (Score:3, Funny)
Don't worry - Bill O'Reilly's new book will be out soon.
For a second... (Score:3, Funny)
More technical introduction to Quant analysis? (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:More technical introduction to Quant analysis? (Score:3, Informative)
Option Volatility & Pricing: Advanced Trading Strategies and Techniques [amazon.com]
Re:More technical introduction to Quant analysis? (Score:5, Informative)
The standard recommendation is Options, Futures, and Other Derivatives by John Hull, and this is in fact a very good book and simultaneously a good introduction to many OTC derivatives. I like Paul Wilmott's book On Quantitative Finance. (This book comes in several versions, some longer and some shorter.)
The books mentioned above stress PDE-based analysis. If you would prefer an approach based on martingale theory, try Financial Calculus by Baxter and Rennie. An Introduction to the Mathematics of Financial Derivatives by Neftci is a more elementary version; think of it as "Stochastic Calculus for Dummies." Neither of these two books contains much information about traded contracts.
Re:More technical introduction to Quant analysis? (Score:4, Informative)
Re:More technical introduction to Quant analysis? (Score:4, Informative)
straight out of the box you should persue other career
objectives.
Also as a former currency and bond trader I can say one of
the issues with modelling in general is liquidity is not
adequately accounted for. It's wonderful to have a
theoretical price, but if the spread is wide enough to drive
a truck through that takes a way a lot of its good.
Likewise when it comes to determining fair market when the
shit is hitting the fan. 1994 was a *very* good year to
illustrate that.
That isn't at all to say modelling and the rest of hte
work of quants is not useful or necessary, just that some
people tend to elevate it to levels beyond reasonable and
worse, apply theory in a vacuum.
But any of you at all interested in this stuff really need
to have a sound grounding in calc and differential equations
at a minimum. A few courses in numerical methods are
helpful too.
Re:More technical introduction to Quant analysis? (Score:3, Interesting)
I wouldn't expect to see any world-beating techniques
Great story from that board (Score:2)
Someone replies with a point which I believe is key to investing;
I have not read that paper or anything like it, but ignorance has nev
More info (Score:3, Informative)
Minor correction to review (Score:2)
"Goldman Sachs" (the bank Derman works for) doesn't have a comma in it's name. Strictly speaking it's actually "Goldman Sachs & Co.", but the last bit is frequently missed off when you're referring to the group as a whole rather than the individual US
Where does one get the info? (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Where does one get the info? (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Where does one get the info? (Score:3, Informative)
You want to download data from Yahoo, go to the "historical prices" page for the stock, and look near the bottom: they have a link to download the data in CSV format. You don't need any specialised software for that!
Example: go to IBM's histori [yahoo.com]
A different opinion on this book (Score:4, Informative)
- i am almost half way through and he has not started working as a quant yet
- Can be boring at times. At one point he starts discussing which radio station he was listening to on his commute. It is inconsistent in content, sometimes very interesting and some time really boring. Maybe it was padded to fill up the required pages.
- Not technical, some of his physics research sounds really interesting, but he does not go into details.
- Not the most lively writting style.
I have no regrets about reading this book, and i will finish it, but i am starting to loose interest in the middle. Hopefully it picks up bit in the second half.
Interesting, yet discouraging (Score:4, Insightful)
Does anyone else find it discouraging that a very smart theoretical physicist ended up being paid huge amounts of money for what is, essentially, non-productive work? This guy could have found a unified field theory by now. Instead, he's helping rich people to transfer money between each other in what is effectively a complex form of gambling.
We have our priorities all wrong.
Re:Interesting, yet discouraging (Score:4, Interesting)
Non-productive? Derivatives can be used for gambling, but they can also be used for transferring risk and creating greater efficiency in the marketplace. If there weren't smart people figuring out what the right prices should be, bid-ask spreads would be wider and commerce would be less efficient. People are paid good money for doing this stuff because there is real value in the result.
This guy could have found a unified field theory by now. Instead, he's helping rich people to transfer money between each other in what is effectively a complex form of gambling.
So your idea of "productive" work is creating a unified field theory? If such a theory were found tomorrow, how would it improve anyone's life? A unified field theory would be useful for calculating things during the first second of the big bang. It is otherwise worthless.
I have a PhD in theoretical physics and I've worked as a quant. Life as a quant beats the hell out of physics any day.
Re:Interesting, yet discouraging (Score:3, Insightful)
i.e. calculating the odds for gambling and more efficiently gambling, respectively. :-)
I admit to b
Re:Interesting, yet discouraging (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Pattern analysis (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Pattern analysis (Score:5, Informative)
This is impossible. First off there is structural error when you attempt to correlate returns-- the returns of a lot of instruments are far from normally distributed, and I have yet to see a factor model that even comes close.
Secondly, and more importantly, you are not receiving a complete picture if you just look at the numbers in the system. As we are speaking about the global economy, the 'entire system' you mention includes the actions of every single person on the planet as well as the weather, etc.
The quants aren't usually trying to predict the overall movement of the market. This is called a "Global Macro" strategy, and relies mostly on qualitative assessments. Quants mainly work on pricing inefficiencies (arbitrage), which can get extremely complicated. Check out When Genius Failed [amazon.com] for an example of a quant-based strategy. (Financial purists please leave me that simplification).
Re:Extremely off topic (Score:2)
Re:Just in case (Score:2)
who are front office work some very long days, and lunch is
usually something that happens the week between xmas and
new years. Depending what markets and products you are
involved in can also result i