Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Image

The Laidoff Ninja 237

walmass writes "My first reaction on seeing the book was, 'Oh no, another book with "Ninja" in the title.' But in this case, the authors have established a case for that: they explained that the first ninjas were peasants who could not take the abuse from the samurai anymore and how they used everyday objects as weapons." Keep reading to see what walmass has to say.
The Laidoff Ninja
author Craig Brown and Javed Ikbal
pages 278
publisher CreateSpace
rating 9/10
reviewer walmass
ISBN 1451558848
summary Learn techniques that helped hundreds of people survive unexpected unemployment
The authors are co-founders of The Layoff Support Network, which seems to be a collective knowledge-sharing site for people looking for jobs, and the authors say that the book distills the knowledge from the website collected over the past 2 years. The authors also started off by stating that this is not just a book about finding a job; this is also a book about surviving until finding a job. I think The Laidoff Ninja (henceforth, "LON") fares well on these claims.

The pre-ramble is listed as section zero (0) — perhaps not surprising considering the two authors are techies: information security is their day job. Keep that in mind when we look at what they manage to extract out of LinkedIn.

One thing I liked about this book right out of the gate is what the authors (or their editor?) decided to call "Quick-shot" guides. Instead of traditional table of contents, they have provided a listing of topics they thought might be interesting to the following types of readers:
- Job seekers with work experience.
- Recent graduates with limited work experience.
- People who are feeling "cash strapped."
- People who are feeling overwhelmed and emotionally distraught.

Considering the last bullet, I was not really surprised to see a section titled "Ninja Psychiatry." The authors made it clear that they do not have any formal training in Psychiatry and are not licensed to practice psychology, psychiatry or any mental health related profession. They then proceeded to dispense advice on feelings of Loss, Depression, Anxiety, Financial Worries and how to deal with rejection after interviews. The section ends with an admonition to say no to drugs, and encouragement to say yes to humor.

There are lots of "Guerrilla this" or "Ninja that" related to layoffs and job hunting, but I don't think I have come across any other book that addresses the mental aspects of being unemployed.

The next section, "Survival" contains a chapter titled "Pull money out of your butt." Crude but effective, and while whole books have been written about making money on eBay, LON addresses this in a practical way.

Frankly, I was a bit surprised to see LON come out and suggest people should not commit crimes when they are desperate for money. I think this would be obvious to any rational person.

There are some tips about maximizing your available financial resources by delaying payment on some utility bills. While legally OK, I question the morality of providing such advice to readers.

Part 4, "Getting a Job" is where the book begins to read like a traditional book, but there are some surprises and hidden gems there. The sections begin with a job-applications toolkit that recommends free email services, OpenOffice and other technological free-bees that would be required for a job-searcher. These are items that the typical Slashdot reader find amusingly basic, but would certainly be useful for seekers who have been out of the hunt for a while.

Part 5, "Finding opportunities" focuses heavily on LinkedIn. It contains a useful exercise where a job-seekers "needs and wants" are sorted in a "value sort" to determine what type of job would be suitable. But in the next breath, the authors suggest folding away the values-list and taking a job (any job) that will pay the bills. I fail to understand this contradictory advice, and wish they would make up their mind.

The LinkedIn content is useful, but only to a new user of LinkedIn. Experienced LinkedIn users may miss the nuggets buried among these basic facts.

Facebook, Twitter and Myspace are also covered. The well-known but often ignored warnings about being careful with what one posts on one's social networking profiles are posted here.

There is a scathing chapter on recruiters. While certain good qualities of recruiters are mentioned, it seems the authors generally believe that recruiters are uncaring commission-hounds that just want to place a candidate and don't care about individuals. The brutal honesty was refreshing, and I'd be curious whether a majority of Slashdot readers would agree or disagree with the authors.

If you consider that stress and anxiety for a jobless person comes from being, well, jobless, then Part 6, "Preparing for the battle" is the most important section in the book. It covers the basics like resumes, cover letters and elevator pitches, etc.

The next chapter is "Reconnaissance" and this is where the hacker background of the authors finally shows up. They show, with examples, how to find the name and email address of recruiters and HR people at practically any company. The theory being, if you can directly contact the HR people at a company, your resume will not be lost in the 1000 other resumes that people send in. There is just one problem with this theory being put into practice. The book assumes, and does not make abundantly clear, that without building up your network first to some reasonable degree this isn't easy to do. But after I have spent a few hours inviting people and joining groups as the book suggested, I was indeed able to pull up the names of some recruiters at Apple and Google. That accomplished, based on the techniques suggested in the LON, I was able to figure out their email addresses and email them. I hope spammers and marketing droids will not read this book and find out these techniques.

For example, I did not know that one could search Facebook by email and zero in on any individual. It is also a violation of my social norms to approach strangers on Facebook about jobs, but the authors provided guidance and specific examples on how to do that, and also when to step back and look for alternatives.

But some of the techniques, such as querying "whois" records to find out the email address format used by a particular company may not be for the average non-technical Joe, and also seem to skirt ethical boundaries without exactly stepping over the line.

This chapter alone is probably worth the price of the book

The book is a good value at 278 pages and the authors have not done any "white space tricks" to make it seem bigger. A laid-off person would probably appreciate the price/performance of this book.

Overall, "The Laidoff Ninja" is an extremely valuable resource on dealing with the mental stress and anguish that may come from being laid off. It presents creative and novel ways of finding jobs by leveraging social media. The book is a tool in itself that can help the reader survive and prepare for the battle that is a job-search, and do it in a highly effective way.

This book is an excellent value if you need help dealing with the stress of unemployment, or want an edge in reaching hiring managers or recruiters at potential employers. This book is not meant to teach you how to write your resume or cover letter. It will work for novice and experienced candidates alike, although the LinkedIn tricks would definitely favor a more technical reader. I highly recommend it.

You can purchase The Laidoff Ninja from amazon.com. Slashdot welcomes readers' book reviews — to see your own review here, read the book review guidelines, then visit the submission page.

*

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

The Laidoff Ninja

Comments Filter:
  • Ronin (Score:2, Interesting)

    by Animats ( 122034 ) on Monday May 03, 2010 @12:29PM (#32073780) Homepage

    A "laid off ninja" is called a ronin. But using that as a title would have given the wrong impression.

    30 years ago, the chance for an individual Americans of experiencing a 50% reduction in income in any given year was a few percent. Now it's about 20%. The normal case today is that being laid off means a permanent reduction in income.

    The people who post on LinkedIn all seem to be looking for work. Typical job descriptions: "Consultant; Marketing Strategist; Social Media Architect", "Community leader & sales pro looking for a sales/service operations, training or leadership role", "Strategic Consultant || Marketing || Advertising || Technology". And lawyers. Lots of lawyers.

  • by Anonymous Coward on Monday May 03, 2010 @12:40PM (#32073922)
    All of the Job recruiting firms I've worked for (Mww, Yhoo, ETFC) are sales driven, and we were trained to meet numbers or find another job. Every quarter, if your numbers aren't met your gone, no warnings, they tell you up front, if you don't sell enough job ads, or place enough folks your out, minimal severance if any. It's numbers numbers numbers, especially if unemployment is down, the stock is down. I quit working for each after a short while, no one else at these divisions or companies(monster) matters other than the sales folk. If something affects them in some negative (time) fashion, but yet increases security or fixes a long standing issue, there is a ton of cat fighting to push for roll-back of the "fix" so the sales folk don't miss their deadline. Nothing else matters, the myopia of these places is astounding.
  • Re:Yeah (Score:4, Interesting)

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday May 03, 2010 @12:54PM (#32074088)

    I talked with a friend that has been out of work for 1 year now... he talks about how hard it is to make ends meet, yet he still has Cable TV and him and his entire family have iphones. I give him no pity. Drop Cable TV, Drop netflix, Drop everything you can. take the phones away from the kids he is off contract so he can drop them all and go to a simple plane for him and nothing for the kids. etc... They live in a 4500 sq foot mc mansion.... the electric bill is over $300 a month because they wont turn off their junk.

    I dont feel bad for him as he dug the hole he is in. they did not need that house, they wanted to look rich. Nope no safety fund of savings...

  • by fermion ( 181285 ) on Monday May 03, 2010 @01:01PM (#32074166) Homepage Journal
    Also, I would hardly compare a laid off worker to an oppressed peasant. The only peasents, at least in the US, are those that choose to think of themselves in that way. If one works day in and day out, and thinks that the job is an entitlement bestowed by a lord, then that is more a problem with the worker, maybe beginning with their education. Too many people ignore the free and cheap education, knowing that they will be given an unskilled job. Even twenty years ago in the large urban district that I went to school in, we had computers and labs that many students chose to ignore. We had and have relatively cheap universities where one can get degrees and training.

    I doubt that anyone who thinks of themselves as a peasant, and the employer as the enemy, is going to have a great deal of luck finding a job quickly. Maybe that is why we so much unemployment. All these peasants waiting for the lord of the manner to give them a job.

    I know that young people are having a hard time finding a job right now. I also know that the same advice I was given is applicable today. No experience means no job, so one has to find a job prior to graduation, even it is sweeping floors. The worst thing for a young person to do is act like their elders in thinking they are too good for a hard days work. A nobleperson is willing to do whatever needs to be done to get the job done. A peasant has to protect their limited dignity.

  • by dcollins ( 135727 ) on Monday May 03, 2010 @02:57PM (#32075484) Homepage

    There's a class drill done here: Take a pellet gun (same shape, location as your carry weapon), shut eyes, spin. Protected partner shouts, charges from ~20 feet away, trying to hit you with a padded stick (or, as you say, closer for greater realism and difficulty). First operation usually needs to be stepping away/clearing the attacking weapon before gun can be drawn for close-range shots. You might try it.

    "There is a great book called More Guns, Less Crime written by an admitted left-wing liberal Harvard professor who started researching the book to show how owning guns is just plain bad"

    Without reading the book, I can see you've got some of your citations incorrect. (1) The author John Lott never attended or taught at Harvard. (Research positions at: U. Maryland, U. Chicago, Yale, Wharton, U. Penn). (2) John Lott advocates a wide array of conservative issues (including gun ownership, women's voting bad for government spending, anti-environmental regulations, anti-affirmative action, anti-abortion, validity of 2000 election, etc.)

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Lott_%28econometricist%29 [wikipedia.org]

    Have to call "not so" on the "admitted left-wing liberal Harvard professor" bit.

  • by Un pobre guey ( 593801 ) on Monday May 03, 2010 @03:23PM (#32075780) Homepage
    When it gets bad enough that your family can no longer predict when they will have their next meal, or if eviction is imminent, or if any of a variety of such extreme cases occur, believe me, you will start thinking of criminal activities. At very least you will seriously consider stealing groceries.

    Never say never. Things can always get worse.
  • Re:From the article (Score:3, Interesting)

    by Publikwerks ( 885730 ) on Monday May 03, 2010 @04:31PM (#32076636)
    Well, that depends on how you define stealing. One of the oldest sets of laws, the Old Testament, says that your allowed to go into a field and eat as long as you don't take any home or store it. Even the harsh dictates of the Old Testament yields to the fact that allowing your neighbor to starve is a far greater wrong than taking without asking.
  • by Slightly Askew ( 638918 ) on Monday May 03, 2010 @06:58PM (#32078834) Journal

    I recently rated a Dean Koontz book 1 out of 5 stars, and hated it so much I was driven to write my first product review ever on Amazon. People think anyone who gives a super low rating are just bitter people, so I broke it down as to why it sucked so bad.

    It was worth finishing because the suckage came at the end, and it was worth reviewing for the same reason it's worth taking the time to post a "Danger - Quicksand" sign.

  • by yukk ( 638002 ) on Monday May 03, 2010 @10:33PM (#32080830)
    I have also worked with many recruiters. The way I look at it is similar to what you say. They are out for themselves. Fair enough. If I'm talking to them I'm out for myself too. Using recruiters is similar to using Google. Well, maybe Bing. You are looking for something and they are offering. They won't always offer exactly what you want so you will need to screen for yourself and don't be afraid to say "No, that job is a poor fit." You don't always use the first link the search engines give you do you ?
    Good recruiters will try to make good matches. This makes them look good to the companies they work for and their paying clients (the companies they place at) plus the people they place will tell others about it and their resource pool will grow. Chances are poor recruiters won't be in the business for long and you don't need to deal with them anyway. Why waste your time. They're a commodity like search engines.
    On the other hand they're humans too and keeping a good relationship with the good ones can pay off nicely when they can confidently go to a company and say "I know this guy and I really think he'd fit in well here". That's an inside recommendation right there.

The hardest part of climbing the ladder of success is getting through the crowd at the bottom.

Working...