Many many professionals long ago abandoned Flash as it became easier to make "pretty" websites with useful dynamic content without it. It was always a nasty piece of technology to work with. So why does the reviewer mention it? Maybe because he's hardly an expert in this field himself? Take this quote: "You will likely find the sites you intuitively return to coincidentally happened to be those very sites that have done it right and have the content you want. "...no shit Sherlock. As if we weren't saying this
Your observation that I write anodyne book is accurate.
With the exception of this review from September - http://books.slashdot.org/story/13/09/30/1314232/book-review-latest-two-books-by-peter-loshin [slashdot.org] – I prefer to write reviews of books that I think are exceptionally good.
I come across plenty of titles that are rubbish, but prefer not to review them.
When I come across a book that I think is a great resource, I will try to share that.
You don't see a problem with this? People need to know that some books are not worth buying to save wasting their money. They also need to know what the bad bits of books are, rather than just reading that, hey, everything is OK. To what do we compare your view with to work out what "good" means? Let me give you an example. I ride a bike. I used to get a commercial magazine that would have cycling gear reviews. Bad products would be marked out as such. Now I don't get that magazine anymore but as a member of
:::People need to know that some books are not worth buying to save wasting their money.
Agreed.
As to your bike analogy, you mentioned a commercial magazine; where people get paid. I do not get paid to review books.
If I was a professional review, then perhaps would have more time to review a wider quality range of books.:::So some may ask "what style of writing does
Thanks for the recommendation. Will try to use it for future reviews.
Lots of people review things for no money (me included). Finding fault is a very important aspect of any review regardless, and actually criticizing something dispels the "payola" accusation for a lot of people. I normally review mountaineering gear that I have bought and used, and my aim is to give a review that I'd have found useful myself. Are the pockets too small on a jacket? Are the boots badly fitting at the heel? Is the compass able to withstand a knock or two? (no it wasn't...!)
Flash...? (Score:3)
Many many professionals long ago abandoned Flash as it became easier to make "pretty" websites with useful dynamic content without it. It was always a nasty piece of technology to work with.
So why does the reviewer mention it? Maybe because he's hardly an expert in this field himself?
Take this quote: "You will likely find the sites you intuitively return to coincidentally happened to be those very sites that have done it right and have the content you want. "...no shit Sherlock. As if we weren't saying this
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:4, Insightful)
You don't see a problem with this? People need to know that some books are not worth buying to save wasting their money. They also need to know what the bad bits of books are, rather than just reading that, hey, everything is OK. To what do we compare your view with to work out what "good" means?
Let me give you an example. I ride a bike. I used to get a commercial magazine that would have cycling gear reviews. Bad products would be marked out as such. Now I don't get that magazine anymore but as a member of
Re: (Score:2)
:::People need to know that some books are not worth buying to save wasting their money.
Agreed.
As to your bike analogy, you mentioned a commercial magazine; where people get paid. I do not get paid to review books.
If I was a professional review, then perhaps would have more time to review a wider quality range of books. :::So some may ask "what style of writing does
Thanks for the recommendation. Will try to use it for future reviews.
Re:Flash...? (Score:2)
Lots of people review things for no money (me included). Finding fault is a very important aspect of any review regardless, and actually criticizing something dispels the "payola" accusation for a lot of people.
I normally review mountaineering gear that I have bought and used, and my aim is to give a review that I'd have found useful myself. Are the pockets too small on a jacket? Are the boots badly fitting at the heel? Is the compass able to withstand a knock or two? (no it wasn't...!)