monetary systems (mostly digitalized) like Bit Coin
Why do those people refuse to spell Bitcoin correctly? I know they hate it since it is new, and they everything new by definition, but why act like fucking morons by pretending to not know how to spell it? I know this Jsuda moron isn't very smart, but he is working hard to make himself look illiterate by doing this Republican-style thing.
" I know this Jsuda moron isn't very smart, but he is working hard to make himself look illiterate by doing this Republican-style thing."
Considering that it was Democrat-style thinking (yes, even on the part of George Bush) that got us into this financial mess (i.e., monetary policy plus government intervention in housing and other markets), I would be careful about referring to Party-style thinking if I were you.
Let's see... what has this DEMOCRAT-controlled administration done for us in the last 6 years?
Least transparent government in living memory; economic "recovery" that really wasn't; inflation that is only now starting to hit ho
There are many things to pick on in this administration; make no doubt about it. But several of the things you bring up are either silly or stupid.
1) Obamacare that nobody wanted; I'm sorry -- you don't like health insurance? Clearly, large segments of the population don't want it, but "nobody" is such a sweeping, wrong-headed generalization that it shows your huge bias. 2) Errr... the economy isn't recovering? Unemployment is down, the market is way up. Which metrics do you use? Yes, it could be *better*, even a fair bit better, but pretending it *isn't* is just stupid. 3) "Inflation rate that is only now beginning to hit home." WAT. After GWB left office, we haven't had inflation break 3%. Honestly, if you'd made point #2 well, you could have used the low inflation rate as a sign of a weakly growing economy. Instead, you're just speaking out your a**. 4) "Wildly expanded NSA surveillance." Citation, please. I'm not saying it's *not* true... but I won't believe it is until you prove it. What *is* true is that Edward Snowden let the cat out of the bag. Much of what he let out of the bag, however, predated Obama, and I see no particular reason to believe government snooping has changed much since... well, Hell, since before J. Edgar Hoover. 5) "Imaginary climate change." Okay, again -- screw what the politics of *anyone* is. Show me objective, not-cherry-picked proof. I'd say it's objectively demonstrable that the climate is changing; the only thing that is left to debate is whether its cause is humans or not. If you actually think the climate isn't changing, however, you may be immune to facts. Indeed, I think we've probably already demonstrated that.
Please. Informed debate is one of the things that makes this country great. Ill-informed spouting of kneejerk $PARTY talking points only shows your bias, and inability to objectively consider multiple points of view. Perhaps you don't *care* to consider multiple points of view, and that's your prerogative... but don't bother trying to ever convince anyone of anything.
Good points, but you are using faulty numbers to dispute #2. Unemployment is down only if you exclude those that dropped out of the labor force. But that may (probably) can't be blamed solely on the administration. I'm looking at the Fed for pumping money into banks, and banks not lending the money out to small businesses (which has pushed the market up somewhat).
Being a puppet for Wall Street? Sure, that seems like a valid criticism. Of this and every other administration in recent times, I suppose.
If the aborigine drafted an IQ test, all of Western civilization would
presumably flunk it.
-- Stanley Garn
Stupid Republicans (Score:-1)
monetary systems (mostly digitalized) like Bit Coin
Why do those people refuse to spell Bitcoin correctly? I know they hate it since it is new, and they everything new by definition, but why act like fucking morons by pretending to not know how to spell it? I know this Jsuda moron isn't very smart, but he is working hard to make himself look illiterate by doing this Republican-style thing.
Re: (Score:0)
" I know this Jsuda moron isn't very smart, but he is working hard to make himself look illiterate by doing this Republican-style thing."
Considering that it was Democrat-style thinking (yes, even on the part of George Bush) that got us into this financial mess (i.e., monetary policy plus government intervention in housing and other markets), I would be careful about referring to Party-style thinking if I were you.
Let's see... what has this DEMOCRAT-controlled administration done for us in the last 6 years?
Least transparent government in living memory; economic "recovery" that really wasn't; inflation that is only now starting to hit ho
Dude. When you pick fights, it helps to use IQ. (Score:2)
There are many things to pick on in this administration; make no doubt about it. But several of the things you bring up are either silly or stupid.
1) Obamacare that nobody wanted; I'm sorry -- you don't like health insurance? Clearly, large segments of the population don't want it, but "nobody" is such a sweeping, wrong-headed generalization that it shows your huge bias.
2) Errr... the economy isn't recovering? Unemployment is down, the market is way up. Which metrics do you use? Yes, it could be *better*, even a fair bit better, but pretending it *isn't* is just stupid.
3) "Inflation rate that is only now beginning to hit home." WAT. After GWB left office, we haven't had inflation break 3%. Honestly, if you'd made point #2 well, you could have used the low inflation rate as a sign of a weakly growing economy. Instead, you're just speaking out your a**.
4) "Wildly expanded NSA surveillance." Citation, please. I'm not saying it's *not* true... but I won't believe it is until you prove it. What *is* true is that Edward Snowden let the cat out of the bag. Much of what he let out of the bag, however, predated Obama, and I see no particular reason to believe government snooping has changed much since... well, Hell, since before J. Edgar Hoover.
5) "Imaginary climate change." Okay, again -- screw what the politics of *anyone* is. Show me objective, not-cherry-picked proof. I'd say it's objectively demonstrable that the climate is changing; the only thing that is left to debate is whether its cause is humans or not. If you actually think the climate isn't changing, however, you may be immune to facts. Indeed, I think we've probably already demonstrated that.
Please. Informed debate is one of the things that makes this country great. Ill-informed spouting of kneejerk $PARTY talking points only shows your bias, and inability to objectively consider multiple points of view. Perhaps you don't *care* to consider multiple points of view, and that's your prerogative... but don't bother trying to ever convince anyone of anything.
Re: (Score:2)
Good points, but you are using faulty numbers to dispute #2. Unemployment is down only if you exclude those that dropped out of the labor force. But that may (probably) can't be blamed solely on the administration. I'm looking at the Fed for pumping money into banks, and banks not lending the money out to small businesses (which has pushed the market up somewhat).
Being a puppet for Wall Street? Sure, that seems like a valid criticism. Of this and every other administration in recent times, I suppose.