A search of www.merriam-webster.com returns: the word you've entered isn't in the dictionary. So you are correct, this is not an official English word.
>>Lookif selfie can be a word, why can’t we let architecting in?
Because "selfie" fills a legitimate and objective need, filling a void created by an advancing technology and culture, neatly and succintly describing a "photograph of someone taken by that same someone, intended primarily for social media."
"Architecting" is superfluous, already synonymous with the shorter and more familiar "building" and "designing," and it contains the pompous subtext of equating the skills and efforts of an archi
The fancy is indeed no other than a mode of memory emancipated from the order
of space and time. -- Samuel Taylor Coleridge
"Architecting" ??? wtf...? (Score:3)
The reviewer does not indicate if the book is written in English, which is relevant because the title clearly is not.
Re: "Architecting" ??? wtf...? (Score:2)
A search of www.merriam-webster.com returns: the word you've entered isn't in the dictionary. So you are correct, this is not an official English word.
But its de facto use is seen at:
http://gapp.usc.edu/graduate-p... [usc.edu]
http://aws.amazon.com/training... [amazon.com]
http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~al... [berkeley.edu]
Lookif selfie can be a word, why can’t we let architecting in?
Re: (Score:3)
>>Lookif selfie can be a word, why can’t we let architecting in?
Because "selfie" fills a legitimate and objective need, filling a void created by an advancing technology and culture, neatly and succintly describing a "photograph of someone taken by that same someone, intended primarily for social media."
"Architecting" is superfluous, already synonymous with the shorter and more familiar "building" and "designing," and it contains the pompous subtext of equating the skills and efforts of an archi