the Internet of Things (IoT) is gaining a lot of attention because we are seeing increasing amounts of "things", such as cars, door locks, baby monitors, etc, that are connected and accessible from the Internet.
Lot of hackers tried to hack the thing as cars, door locks, baby monitors, etc, that are connected and accessible from the Internet. Nowadays in the huge risk but huge money on this things they can get easily. And we just want to aware to everyone on the thing. In the world, has great latest technology then you can control this thing with particular code. Can't be hack ever you can check this thing on http://www.locksmithsinscottsd... [locksmiths...tsdale.com]
Ohhh really its a mess as i thought MD5 easy to crack. We can control as well as with internet. But i think its now so easy for my friend. He is also a hacker too and they can hack anything on internet.
>> Chapter 9 includes hypothetical scenarios of an security executive abusing the "buzz" around IoT >> concept of bug bounty programs >> chapter 7 refreshing because it approaches security from the eyes of someone who wants to design a new IoT product
So...who's the audience, exactly? Executives? Developers? Engineers? None of the above?
>> The slang term *encraption* (with the emphasis on *crap*) is affectionately used by the cyber- security community to call out badly implemented encryption
I'v been in the industry 15 years. I've never heard anyone use that term.
>> The slang term *encraption* (with the emphasis on *crap*) is affectionately used by the cyber- security community to call out badly implemented encryption
I'v been in the industry 15 years. I've never heard anyone use that term.
One explanation is that your co-workers use the term all the time, just not to your face.
Anybody who wants to understand how truly fucking pathetic the "interweb of stuff" is, how horribly broken it is, and how corporations are completely inept at security.
I'd almost call it a case study in showing why the "intertubes of things" is nothing more than marketing hype, overblown claims, and shoddy products.
Because, really, it is marketing hype, overblown claims, and shoddy products.
I'm betting 80% of all consumer products which want to have network connectivity are probably trivially exploitable, with the remaining 20% still being easily exploitable. Which is why I won't buy and of this shit, and why I do my best Nelson "Ha ha!" when I hear about how insecure they are.
I might have to seek this out... it sounds like a catalog of incompetence, greed, and hubris.
Any chance this book is available for my IoT toaster, so I can read it while waiting for my toast?
No, silly. It's available as an ePub. You're going to be using your IoT toaster app on your phone anyway, so you may as well read it on that. Your IoT toaster will send you a push notification when it's done.
I'm going to sell air-gap-ultrasecured(TM) cars, door locks, baby monitors, etc, that are unreachable from the Internet of Things. They will be impervious to any and all Internet of Things protocols! You might break an encryption key with your ad-hoc compute cluster but grandma's skeleton key is unPwnable!
... you can't turn the lights off because the internet connection is down.... there's a three-second round-trip lag to turn your car on.... you can turn your heating off from halfway around the world with your phone, but can't find a button on the wall.... your computer gets a virus and your TV starts advertising sites selling viagra of dubious origin.
The Internet of Things is about sensors everywhere and to a more limited extent actuators. But actuators are relatively few compared to sensors. Fine grained sensors are out at the edge here there is no normal wireless connectivity and are quite a challenge to innovate, power and scale out at very low cost. The next challenging is gathering the edge information at highly distributed small systems that may be more wireless/internet connected in some form. While you could hack to corrupt data feeds flowi
The Internet of Things is about sensors everywhere and to a more limited extent actuators. But actuators are relatively few compared to sensors. Fine grained sensors are out at the edge here there is no normal wireless connectivity and are quite a challenge to innovate, power and scale out at very low cost. The next challenging is gathering the edge information at highly distributed small systems that may be more wireless/internet connected in some form. While you could hack to corrupt data feeds flowing up the question is what would be the significant payoff to make it worth it at all? You corrupt the out on the farm soil sensors so the watering systems give too much or too little water? Not so easy to get away with and no payoff beyond malice and an ego trip.
Look carefully everyone - this is the argument from shitty devs of limited cognitive capacity that results in insecure products. The argument "why would anyone want to hack me" is stupid, and people making the argument deserve all the derision we are laying on them. They work under the assumption that no one has an enemy, or an ex, or a corporate competitor, or a disgruntled customer, or an angry creditor...etc... who wants to take them down. This is a stupid argument and you should feel stupid for putting
And not on some of that Packt Crap. Interesting, but here comes a short story about 1979:
We had Internets of Things back then- Magnets and Faraday Cups and Wire Chambers- those sorts of Things so useful for a huge Particle Accelerator. There was a basic Modcomp Computer addressing scheme: a unique Four Hex Address followed by a Four Hex Command. The device would respond with that Four Hex Address and a Four Hex Response. Very simple and abstract and Real Time; most of it was hardwired in the PDM Chassis, and
Sorry peeps. But I have zero interest in connecting anything in my house to the internet other than my computers as I at least stand a chance of having reasonable security on them (I configure them)
It's plainly obvious to me that most manufacturers are utterly clueless. Hard coded piss weak default passwords, internet facing administrative backdoors which are open by default, open ports, a design philosophy of "everything open to anyone by default", no thought that someone might try to attack the device b
Five is a sufficiently close approximation to infinity.
-- Robert Firth
"One, two, five."
-- Monty Python and the Holy Grail
To Serve Man (Score:5, Funny)
The Internet of Things...it's a cookbook!
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Umm...who's the audience, exactly? (Score:4, Informative)
>> Chapter 9 includes hypothetical scenarios of an security executive abusing the "buzz" around IoT
>> concept of bug bounty programs
>> chapter 7 refreshing because it approaches security from the eyes of someone who wants to design a new IoT product
So...who's the audience, exactly? Executives? Developers? Engineers? None of the above?
>> The slang term *encraption* (with the emphasis on *crap*) is affectionately used by the cyber- security community to call out badly implemented encryption
I'v been in the industry 15 years. I've never heard anyone use that term.
Re: (Score:1)
>> The slang term *encraption* (with the emphasis on *crap*) is affectionately used by the cyber- security community to call out badly implemented encryption
I'v been in the industry 15 years. I've never heard anyone use that term.
One explanation is that your co-workers use the term all the time, just not to your face.
Re: (Score:0)
You give very very important information..
Re:Umm...who's the audience, exactly? (Score:4, Insightful)
Anybody who wants to understand how truly fucking pathetic the "interweb of stuff" is, how horribly broken it is, and how corporations are completely inept at security.
I'd almost call it a case study in showing why the "intertubes of things" is nothing more than marketing hype, overblown claims, and shoddy products.
Because, really, it is marketing hype, overblown claims, and shoddy products.
I'm betting 80% of all consumer products which want to have network connectivity are probably trivially exploitable, with the remaining 20% still being easily exploitable. Which is why I won't buy and of this shit, and why I do my best Nelson "Ha ha!" when I hear about how insecure they are.
I might have to seek this out ... it sounds like a catalog of incompetence, greed, and hubris.
No time to read (Score:3)
Any chance this book is available for my IoT toaster, so I can read it while waiting for my toast?
Re: (Score:2)
Any chance this book is available for my IoT toaster, so I can read it while waiting for my toast?
No, silly. It's available as an ePub. You're going to be using your IoT toaster app on your phone anyway, so you may as well read it on that. Your IoT toaster will send you a push notification when it's done.
Re: (Score:1)
Only if you download it to the toaster using your Amazon Echo..
IoT is for cows. (Score:0)
You are all cows. Cows say moo. MOOOO! MOOOO! Moo cows MOOOOO! Moo say the cows. YOU COWS!!
Re: (Score:3)
>> IoT is for cows
For once I have to agree. http://www.allenleigh.ca/index... [allenleigh.ca]
Shawon (Score:0)
Many many thanks to share this information.
"Internet of Things" vs "Internet" (Score:0)
What is the fricking difference?
Obviously (Score:0)
Abuse is the only explanation for the Internet of Things that's made any sense.
Distinction between online and physical spaces .. (Score:2)
my new business plan (Score:3)
I'm going to sell air-gap-ultrasecured(TM) cars, door locks, baby monitors, etc, that are unreachable from the Internet of Things. They will be impervious to any and all Internet of Things protocols! You might break an encryption key with your ad-hoc compute cluster but grandma's skeleton key is unPwnable!
The internet of things is here when: (Score:5, Insightful)
... you can't turn the lights off because the internet connection is down. ... there's a three-second round-trip lag to turn your car on. ... you can turn your heating off from halfway around the world with your phone, but can't find a button on the wall. ... your computer gets a virus and your TV starts advertising sites selling viagra of dubious origin.
Re: (Score:3)
Noted: ... is the slashdot code for 'screw newlines.'
in wmd on credit psychopath new nyet nyam (Score:0)
the network abuses you... you go larry lessig, bring chomsky & scott olsen with you...
Not applicable (Score:2)
The Internet of Things is about sensors everywhere and to a more limited extent actuators. But actuators are relatively few compared to sensors. Fine grained sensors are out at the edge here there is no normal wireless connectivity and are quite a challenge to innovate, power and scale out at very low cost. The next challenging is gathering the edge information at highly distributed small systems that may be more wireless/internet connected in some form. While you could hack to corrupt data feeds flowi
Re: (Score:2)
The Internet of Things is about sensors everywhere and to a more limited extent actuators. But actuators are relatively few compared to sensors. Fine grained sensors are out at the edge here there is no normal wireless connectivity and are quite a challenge to innovate, power and scale out at very low cost. The next challenging is gathering the edge information at highly distributed small systems that may be more wireless/internet connected in some form. While you could hack to corrupt data feeds flowing up the question is what would be the significant payoff to make it worth it at all? You corrupt the out on the farm soil sensors so the watering systems give too much or too little water? Not so easy to get away with and no payoff beyond malice and an ego trip.
Look carefully everyone - this is the argument from shitty devs of limited cognitive capacity that results in insecure products. The argument "why would anyone want to hack me" is stupid, and people making the argument deserve all the derision we are laying on them. They work under the assumption that no one has an enemy, or an ex, or a corporate competitor, or a disgruntled customer, or an angry creditor...etc... who wants to take them down. This is a stupid argument and you should feel stupid for putting
and to think I lived (Score:0)
...for several decades without a Bluetooth connected screwdriver!
For Once, A Decent Book Review (Score:0)
And not on some of that Packt Crap.
Interesting, but here comes a short story about 1979:
We had Internets of Things back then- Magnets and Faraday Cups and Wire Chambers- those sorts of Things so useful for a huge Particle Accelerator.
There was a basic Modcomp Computer addressing scheme: a unique Four Hex Address followed by a Four Hex Command. The device would respond with that Four Hex Address and a Four Hex Response. Very simple and abstract and Real Time; most of it was hardwired in the PDM Chassis, and
More like the "Internet Of Piss Poor Security" (Score:2)
Sorry peeps. But I have zero interest in connecting anything in my house to the internet other than my computers as I at least stand a chance of having reasonable security on them (I configure them)
It's plainly obvious to me that most manufacturers are utterly clueless. Hard coded piss weak default passwords, internet facing administrative backdoors which are open by default, open ports, a design philosophy of "everything open to anyone by default", no thought that someone might try to attack the device b